TOP

 

GOVERNMENT LITIGATION

Our reputation for insightful research and our sensitivity to the needs of government clients have attracted the interest of agencies around the country from city governments to the United States Department of Justice.

Jurors often have strong opinions about the responsibilities and the conduct of government agencies and officials. We are experienced in dealing with the problems faced by public agencies, as plaintiffs or defendants, and are adept at understanding how people’s attitudes can influence the outcome of such litigation. Public expectations run the gamut from those who want to believe the best of the government to those who expect the worst. Feelings about the roles played by the government vary just as widely, from those who want the government to be pro-active and strong to those who fear government power and want to control it.

A sampling of our cases:

Restraint of Trade

Thirty-six state attorneys general and private class action attorneys sued three major pharmaceutical corporations and doctors for colluding to prevent consumers from purchasing products from low cost outlets instead of from their doctors. We assisted the trial team through mock trials and jury selection. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs' case, the case settled very favorably for the plaintiffs and the consumers they represented.

Construction

The county government for a major metropolitan area was sued in a dispute over responsibility for construction cost overruns on the largest wastewater treatment plant in the state. Our focus group research in this highly publicized case helped the County understand the underlying concerns of its citizens.

Pension Funds

A lawsuit was brought by public entities against corporate executives of a bankrupt company and a professional consulting firm claiming fraud and professional negligence resulting in the loss of millions of dollars in pension funds. Our mock trial research on behalf of the public entities contributed to the attorneys' success in negotiating a favorable outcome for their clients.

Airport Revenue

Airlines using LAX sued the City of Los Angeles claiming that the City's increases in landing fees constituted a breach of contract. Though the case was eventually decided by a judge, we helped the trial team assess the risks and benefits of a potential jury trial in this $100 million case.

Back to Experience

Here’s what our clients say about us…
 


TOP



copyright © 2004, Bonora D'Andrea LLC